Abstract

Recent literature has usually invoked the name Canis hallstromi Troughton, 1957, though with varied taxonomic interpretations, when writing of dogs thought to be unique to New Guinea. The name Canis familiaris novaehiberniae was proposed for dogs from the New Guinea region 130 years before Troughton published Canis hallstromi but has been overlooked in the recent literature, as has Canis familiaris papuensis Ramsay, 1879 from southeastern New Guinea. The taxonomic status of New Guinea dogs remains controversial but if dogs from New Guinea and New Ireland represent a single heterogeneous gene pool, then C. hallstromi Troughton and C. familiaris papuensis Ramsay would be junior subjective synonyms of C. familiaris novaehiberniae Lesson, 1827. Recent studies of New Guinea dogs are weakened by their failure to attend carefully to the history of discovery and nomenclature of these animals.

 
Download Complete Work

Bibliographic Data

Short Form
Dwyer et al., 2021. Rec. Aust. Mus. 73(4): 131–136
Author
Peter D. Dwyer; Harry E. Parnaby; Monica Minnegal
Year
2021
Title
A 19th century New Ireland dog, Canis familiaris novaehiberniae Lesson, 1827 and the status of Canis hallstromi Troughton, 1957
Serial Title
Records of the Australian Museum
Volume
73
Issue
4
Start Page
131
End Page
136
DOI
10.3853/j.2201-4349.73.2021.1772
Language
en
Date Published
10 November 2021
Cover Date
10 November 2021
ISSN
ISSN 0067-1975 (print); ISSN 2201-4349 (online)
CODEN
RAUMAJ
Publisher
The Australian Museum
Place Published
Sydney, Australia
Subjects
MAMMALIA; TAXONOMY; NEW GUINEA
Digitized
10 November 2021
Available Online
10 November 2021
Reference Number
1772
EndNote
1772.enw
Title Page
1772.pdf
File size: 0 bytes
Complete Work
1772_complete.pdf
File size: 0 bytes